Main Index
History Index
Modeling Index

Trail Index


1840's
1850's
1860's
1870's
1880's
1890's
1900's
1910's
1920's
1930's
1940's
1950's
1960's
1970's
1980's
1990's
2000's

Archives>Article


New Jersey Herald - March 2, 1911 issue
Lackawanna Obstruction Case

In Andover Borough Heard at Trenton

The first case heard in the Supreme Court at Trenton last week was the appeal of the Lackawanna Railroad Company against its conviction in the Sussex County courts of maintaining a nuisance in Andover Borough by obstructing the highway with two culverts. As will be remembered in the lower court Judge Hunt directed a verdict against the railroad. Mr. Ssallman, the Lackawanna's regular counsel, contended in his argument at Trenton that the trial court erred in refusing to dismiss the indictment when the State rested its case and also in excluding evidence offered by the defendant to show the capacity of the passageway and the limited volume of travel on the highway. It was also claimed that there was error in charging the jury that railroad not legal right to build the passageway as constructed.

Prosecutor Henry Huston, who appeared for the State, contended that the railroad had no legal authority for pre-empting a part of the highway, and that by doing so it became liable to indictment for maintaining a nuisance.

The decision will be rendered at the June term.